Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the jetpack-backup domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/vgbdoo6u2d7y/public_html/mcmillanresearch.com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121
Challenging the Trudeau Covid narrative - McMillan Research Limited
Select Page
Responsive Centered YouTube Video
Analyzing the distinction between misinformation and disinformation in political discourse regarding Covid
  • The importance of words in political discourse and the impact on public opinion. 0:15

  • Clarifying the difference between misinformation and disinformation. 3:19

  • Misinformation as sharing incorrect or misleading information irresponsibly. 4:00

  • The influence of disinformation at a senior level in shaping public perception. 4:27

Discussion on misinformation, disinformation, and trust in health authorities during the pandemic
  • Identification of misinformation and disinformation by unknown fact checkers. 5:18

  • Importance of conducting research to avoid being labeled as spreading misinformation. 5:45

  • Challenge of distinguishing between perception and scientific facts. 6:47

  • Necessity to trust experts and the consequences of experts making mistakes. 8:15

  • Loss of trust in health authorities due to unexpected outcomes during the pandemic. 9:06

  • Resulting confusion and lack of trust among the general public in health information. 9:24

Discussion on acknowledging vaccine harms, misinformation, and risk-benefit analysis in Covid-19 vaccination
  • Acknowledging potential vaccine harms is crucial, especially for high-risk individuals. 10:48

  • Distinguishing between personal choice and deliberate misinformation in vaccine hesitancy. 13:10

  • Importance of communicating risk-benefit analysis in vaccine rollout to different risk groups. 14:29

  • Utilization of algorithms like The Q score for personalized risk assessment in Covid-19 vaccination. 15:00

Examining the impact of Covid-19 vaccination incentives and mandates on public health outcomes
  • Risk differentiation based on age and comorbidities was not properly considered during the pandemic. 15:18

  • Vaccination was emphasized as the key solution to the public health crisis, with up to 20 million lives estimated to be saved globally. 16:22

  • Questions raised about the assumption that vaccination was solely responsible for saving lives, citing examples from Africa and Papua New Guinea. 17:23

  • Incentives and protections were used in Canada to encourage vaccination, leading to higher vaccination rates compared to other countries. 18:35

  • Concerns raised about the gentleness of inducements and limitations placed on unvaccinated individuals, potentially infringing on personal rights. 19:15

  • Discussion on the appropriateness of mandates and rulings related to Covid-19 measures, particularly in the context of personal freedoms and public health. 20:01

Critique on Covid mandates, vaccine effectiveness, and potential consequences on mortality
  • Mandates may be necessary in high-risk scenarios like Ebola, but should not be applied universally for low-risk groups. 20:08

  • Concerns raised about the scientific community’s oversight on vaccine immunity and the evasion of Omicron variant. 21:30

  • All-cause mortality should be considered in evaluating interventions, not just severe Covid-19 cases. 22:30

  • Warning issued on potential rise in autoimmunity-related issues and uncertain outcomes in the future. 23:01