Select Page
Responsive Centered YouTube Video
Controversy surrounding dismissal of a professor for advocating alternative COVID-19 treatment and challenging the system
  • Discussion on Professor COV’s dismissal from Harvard University 0:23

  • Dr. Shankara facing backlash for advocating zero COVID deaths and alternative treatments 1:10

  • Dr. Shankara’s experience of being targeted by the system for his unconventional views 2:36

  • Dr. Shankara’s approach to understanding pathophysiology and treating COVID-19 patients 3:20

  • System’s preference for following standard protocols over exploring alternative treatments 4:00

  • Importance of early treatment and sharing effective strategies during a pandemic 5:00

Scientist fired for advocating age-based protection over universal lockdowns, highlighting inconsistencies in COVID-19 measures
  • Professor MartinCOV, a Harvard University professor, was fired for supporting age-based protection over universal lockdowns. 5:24

  • He was part of the Great Barrington Declaration, advocating for a different approach to COVID-19 response. 5:33

  • Lockdowns were criticized for their ineffectiveness in curbing the spread of an airborne virus like COVID-19. 7:50

  • Inconsistencies in lockdown measures were highlighted, impacting social, economic, and educational aspects. 8:27

  • Protecting the highest-risk group while allowing low-risk individuals to build herd immunity was emphasized. 9:09

  • Early treatment options were not acknowledged, leading to increased pressure on the hospital system. 9:46

  • Failure to consider long-term consequences and the importance of early treatment were major concerns in the COVID-19 response. 10:01

Scientist fired for challenging COVID policies and advocating for open scientific discourse
  • Leaving infected patients untreated leads to worsening conditions and the need for more critical care. 10:40

  • Scientist highlighted the illogical handling of the pandemic and the stifling of scientific discourse. 11:03

  • Scientist was fired for contradicting policy despite being part of the CDC vaccine group. 12:08

  • Scientist, despite having a weakened immune system, survived COVID without vaccination. 13:30

  • Discussion on the benefits of natural immunity and the need for antibody testing to determine immunity status. 14:13

  • Mention of the importance of acknowledging decades of science on natural immunity. 15:35

  • Consideration of mucosal immunity as a factor in determining exposure to COVID and antibody levels. 15:59

Challenges in academia and scientific discourse, importance of experience over textbook knowledge
  • Importance of trusting individuals’ knowledge even without antibodies during the pandemic. 16:15

  • Criticism towards ignoring data from Sweden and labeling dissenting opinions. 16:52

  • Need for scientific community to value diverse opinions for progress. 17:34

  • Discussion on expertise, experience, and the advancement of science. 19:18

  • Call for reevaluation of how academia values knowledge and challenges to move forward. 20:15

  • Recognition of the speaker’s voice and learned perspective as a challenge to regulators. 20:46

  • Acknowledgment of the speaker’s credibility and depth of knowledge in science. 21:03

Challenges in academia: silencing of dissenting voices and lack of academic freedom
  • New infectious disease led to uncharted territory in pathology and treatment interventions. 21:40

  • Acknowledgement from academic institution as an expert in the field of COVID-19. 22:25

  • Disagreement over COVID-19 policies and vaccine mandates among professors. 23:18

  • Concerns over university politics influencing academic freedom and employment decisions. 24:56

  • Importance of valuing truth and promoting open scientific discourse for the survival of science. 26:19

Dismissal of professor highlights bias in vaccine policy and calls for unbiased judgment
  • Vaccine policy was surrounded by propaganda and prejudice during the pandemic. 29:21

  • Prejudice against those questioning vaccines led to job loss and family rifts. 29:30

  • Need for an equal mix of vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals in adjudicating panels. 31:36

  • Unbiased judgment crucial to ensure fairness in cases related to vaccine policies. 31:43

  • Influencing science requires a diverse and balanced perspective on vaccine-related issues. 31:52

  • Racially charged cases require diverse representation for a just outcome. 32:00

Ensuring balanced judgment in cases involving vaccination is crucial for fair outcomes
  • Importance of having both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals in the judiciary for a fair hearing. 32:21

  • The need for open discussions between different viewpoints to achieve balanced judgments. 33:19

  • Suggesting a precedent where decision-makers must represent diverse perspectives. 34:01

The story unfolds in the imaginative setting of a child’s nose, narrating the adventures of a Lymphocyte family—comprising a wise Mother, brave Father, determined Brother, and heroic Baby—as they battle invading microorganisms. The narrative takes an imaginative leap, combining the child’s humming with the Lymphocytes’ efforts, symbolizing the power of unity in overcoming challenges.

Kickstarter Lymphocyte family

Our mission with ‘Humming Heroes’ is to narrow the chasm between scientific complexity and layperson understanding. It’s an invitation for both children and adults to embark on an educational journey into the captivating world of the immune system.