fbpx
Select Page

Was Awarding the 2023 Nobel Prize for mRNA Technology Premature?

May 25, 2024 | COVID-19, Research, Treatment

Dr. Philip McMillan discusses the potential mistake in the Nobel Prize institution and the increasing delay in awarding Nobel Prizes.

  • The Nobel Prize in physiology and medicine is one of the most significant scientific accolades. • 0:37

  • Scientists are waiting longer than ever to receive a Nobel Prize, with the delay getting longer. • 3:06

  • The average time between publication and Nobel recognition in physiology and medicine is now 25 years. • 4:25

The video discusses the Nobel Prize awarded in 2023 for the development of effective mRNA vaccines against COVID-19, highlighting concerns about the timing and potential political pressures.

  • The Nobel Prize in physiology and medicine was awarded to scientists for the development of effective mRNA vaccines against COVID-19. • 4:55

  • The short timeframe since the rollout of vaccines and the lack of long-term outcomes raise concerns about the effectiveness of mRNA vaccines. • 5:32

  • The Nobel Prize was awarded just two and a half years after the rollout, which is significantly shorter than the usual 25-year gap. • 6:37

  • The video questions the reasons for the urgency and potential political influences on the Nobel Prize decision. • 7:21

  • The difference in inclusion between Robert Malone, who conceptualized mRNA vaccines, and the awarded scientists is discussed. • 8:06

The video discusses the Nobel Prize awarded to Andrew Fire and Craig Mello for their discovery of RNA interference, and raises concerns about the long-term safety and potential consequences of using this technology.

  • The Nobel Prize was awarded to Andrew Fire and Craig Mello for their work on RNA interference. • 8:59

  • The decision to award them the Nobel Prize without acknowledging earlier contributors was a political decision. • 9:17

  • The long-term effects of using RNA interference technology, particularly in relation to COVID-19, are not fully understood. • 9:32

  • There are concerns about vaccine injuries and the spread of lipid nanoparticles. • 10:43

  • The speaker wishes more time and consideration had been given before taking such a big step in using this technology. • 11:26