Insights into vaccine regulatory protocols outside of a pandemic from Susan F. Langlois.
-
Susan Langlois started her career in 1972 as a lab technologist at Cana Laboratories. • 2:50
-
Langlois’ expertise spans from biologicals to medical devices in the pharmaceutical industry. • 3:10
-
She transitioned to regulatory affairs in 1976, overseeing compliance with new regulations. • 3:42
-
Langlois retired as the Director of Regulatory Affairs at Cana Laboratories after 20 years. • 4:16
-
She continued her regulatory work with startup biologic companies post-retirement. • 4:58
-
Her vast experience includes working with biologic companies on regulatory affairs, clinical trials, and quality control. • 5:33
-
Langlois’ highlight was her involvement in the approval process of BCG vaccine for therapeutic use. • 6:23
-
Langlois worked on getting the BCG vaccine approved for therapeutic use in bladder cancer. • 6:33
-
She was instrumental in the approval of BCG vaccine for bladder cancer treatment in Canada and the U.S. • 7:06
Overview of vaccine development process and regulatory protocols explained by Susan F. Langlois.
-
Regulations for biologics and vaccines were established in the 1970s to ensure safety for healthy recipients. • 9:26
-
Vaccines are given to healthy individuals to prevent diseases, unlike drugs for treating the sick. • 10:04
-
Research is required to determine the need for a vaccine and understand the disease before production. • 13:09
-
Testing in animals for safety and efficacy is a crucial step in vaccine development. • 13:48
Overview of vaccine regulatory protocols and timeline for development outside emergencies.
-
Vaccine development process involves preclinical studies, safety studies, effectiveness studies, and manufacturing consistency checks. • 13:55
-
Regulatory process includes submitting data to regulators, conducting safety and effectiveness studies, and obtaining establishment licenses. • 14:02
-
Phase one focuses on safety, phase two on effectiveness, and phase three on efficacy through placebo-controlled studies. • 14:10
-
Scaling up production requires demonstrating consistency in manufacturing and passing regulatory inspections. • 16:22
-
Postmarketing strategies, labeling, and advertising also need regulatory approval before vaccine launch. • 17:06
-
Standard vaccine development process takes around 10 years due to rigorous regulatory requirements and testing. • 17:23
-
Regulations allow for streamlining processes for unique products targeting unmet medical needs. • 18:09
-
Staggering phases can be done in emergencies to accelerate vaccine development while meeting regulatory standards. • 18:54
-
All steps in the regulatory process are essential for ensuring the safety and efficacy of vaccines before approval. • 19:06
Overview of emergency vaccine approval regulations during a pandemic
-
Emergency use approval process in the US and Canad. • 19:33
-
US FDA process for emergency use release. • 20:30
-
Regulators prioritize safety and data availabilit. • 20:30
-
Companies must meet safety criteria for approva. • 21:11
-
Interim order in Canada with one-year expir. • 21:57
-
Expedited submission process for emergency approval. • 22:38
-
Priority reviews for COVID-related products worldwid. • 24:49
-
No preferential treatment for companies in approval proces. • 25:08
-
Regulations amended for fast-track submission. • 25:59
Explanation of why vaccine data is not released immediately under emergency approval.
-
mRNA technology allowed quicker vaccine productio. • 26:48
-
Regulators evaluate data for safety profile and risk-benefi. • 27:14
-
FDA protects interim data as intellectual propert. • 30:09
-
Companies redact proprietary information before data releas. • 31:04
-
Requests for data under Freedom of Information Act are processed chronologicall. • 31:41
-
Approval process for full data release may take up to a year or mor. • 32:07
Regulatory protocols for vaccine approval during emergencies require expedited processes.
-
Regulators struggle to explain complex processes to the general public. • 32:16
-
External contractors often manage clinical trials for pharmaceutical companies. • 34:09
-
Pharmaceutical companies follow regulatory guidelines to expedite vaccine production. • 36:23
-
Regulators request minimum data for initial approval with a commitment to gather more over time. • 38:07
Overview of vaccine regulatory protocols and safety monitoring systems for emergency drug releases.
-
Safety monitoring systems rely on physician-reported adverse events related to vaccinations. • 38:30
-
Public health agencies play a role in monitoring signals of adverse events beyond initial surveillance. • 40:05
-
Long-term effects beyond 28 days post-vaccination may not be captured by current surveillance systems. • 41:25
-
Government and medical authorities should ensure transparency in communicating known and unknown risks of vaccines. • 43:00
-
Concerns exist about the lack of long-term safety data for emergency-released vaccines. • 43:14
-
Individuals have the right to accept or reject vaccines under emergency use authorization. • 43:36
-
Regulations mandate informing individuals of known risks and benefits of emergency vaccines. • 43:50
-
Data gaps exist in certain populations like pregnant or immune-compromised individuals. • 44:04
-
Pharmaceutical companies publish monographs detailing available data on vaccines. • 44:11
Challenges in ensuring informed decisions and responsibilities in COVID-19 vaccine mandates.
-
Concerns about lack of informed consent for vaccine recipient. • 44:50
-
Regulators and companies provide information, but politicians make mandate decision. • 45:15
-
Responsibility for vaccine mandate decisions unclea. • 46:45
-
Regulators ensure safety but may not challenge government mandate. • 49:00
-
Definition of ‘safe’ varies and may not imply zero risk. • 49:25
-
Government repeats safety claims without ensuring informed consen. • 50:04
-
Lack of monitoring for informed consent in vaccine administratio. • 50:31
-
Government push for vaccination without complete data may harm public healt. • 50:36
Discussion on vaccine risk-benefit assessment, regulatory responsibilities, and response to vaccine efficacy.
-
Risk-benefit assessment varies based on health profiles and comorbidities. • 50:55
-
Individuals need to make decisions on vaccine risk-benefit based on their health status. • 52:01
-
Mass vaccination aims for herd immunity but may not always be effective. • 53:14
-
Regulatory responsibility includes ongoing safety and efficacy reviews of vaccines. • 54:38
-
Companies may need to adjust vaccines based on efficacy and safety signals. • 55:10
-
Changes to vaccines require additional approval processes and clinical trials. • 55:54
-
Vaccine efficacy is not just about antibody response but also about disease spread prevention. • 56:13
-
Clinical trials need to consider easy-to-demonstrate endpoints for positive outcomes. • 56:43
Vaccine efficacy in reducing severe disease and deaths, but not focused on stopping spread. Ethical concerns on booster distribution.
-
Vaccines aimed at reducing hospitalizations and deaths, not infection spread. • 56:55
-
Lack of evidence demonstrating vaccines reduce infection spread. • 57:01
-
Shift from lockdowns for vulnerable to herd immunity strategy questioned. • 57:52
-
Vaccines initially targeted high-risk individuals, then expanded to younger age groups. • 58:06
-
Monitoring based on positive PCR tests, not disease symptoms. • 1:00:25
-
Ethical dilemma in distributing boosters to children while vulnerable populations lack vaccines. • 1:02:09
-
Importance of boosting for individuals with compromised immune systems. • 1:02:51
-
Limited long-term studies on vaccine efficacy and duration of antibodies. • 1:03:26
Responsibilities for monitoring all-cause mortality and adverse effects post-vaccine administration.
-
Public health is responsible for monitoring all-cause mortality and adverse effects post-vaccine administration. • 1:03:37
-
Long-term studies are necessary to track antibody levels and vaccine efficacy over time. • 1:03:43
-
Ethical considerations may lead to offering vaccines to placebo groups post-trial. • 1:04:21
-
All-cause mortality is typically monitored during clinical trials, with government oversight post-trial. • 1:06:00
-
Public health agencies are responsible for monitoring trends in all-cause mortality and adverse effects post-vaccine introduction. • 1:09:24
Insights on vaccine development, regulatory challenges, and public health messaging during pandemics.
-
Vaccine adverse events are reported to companies and governments for monitoring. • 1:09:43
-
Public health monitors signals of adverse events post-vaccination over time. • 1:10:01
-
COVID-19 may trigger autoimmune responses, impacting severe disease outcomes. • 1:10:27
-
Vaccines aim to prevent severe disease in high-risk individuals with comorbidities. • 1:12:54
-
Challenges exist in rebuilding trust in pharmaceutical industry and public health. • 1:13:32
-
Pharmaceutical companies faced criticism for vaccine efficacy amidst evolving virus strains. • 1:14:07
-
Clear messaging from governments is crucial to address public confusion on vaccine purpose. • 1:15:05
Insights into upcoming events and gratitude expressed at the end of the interview.
Understanding the impact of liver diseases and potential mechanisms in managing them
- Presentation on liver diseases and potential mechanisms • 0:08
- Fatty liver prevalence and its link to insulin resistance • 1:29
- Focus on alcohol liver disease, fatty liver, and liver injury • 2:05
- Importance of recognizing liver health for overall well-being • 2:36
- Risk of harm from multiple factors affecting liver function • 2:54